Question 1

What business features may constitute an SVF stored value facility in Hong Kong?

Accepted Answer

The assessment should be based on function: if a facility stores monetary value deposited by users from time to time and, under the issuer’s undertaking, uses it to pay for goods or services or to make a payment to another person, it may constitute an SVF. Whether the regime applies must still be assessed against the actual contracts, flow of funds and undertakings; the conclusion cannot be based solely on the product’s marketing name.

Question 2

Could physical prepaid cards and online wallet accounts both qualify as SVFs?

Accepted Answer

Yes. The definition of an SVF may cover device-based facilities such as physical cards and watches, as well as account-based facilities accessed through the internet, computers or mobile networks. The key is not whether the medium is a card, but whether there is stored value, a payment undertaking by the issuer and corresponding arrangements for use. The specific product must still be assessed on its facts.

Question 3

Does a product fall outside the definition of an SVF simply because it is used online and has no physical card?

Accepted Answer

No. Online use only or the absence of a physical card does not automatically exclude an SVF; an online account itself may be a covered form of facility. The analysis should continue to examine how user funds enter the account, who undertakes to accept payments or make payments to others, and the available merchant and redemption arrangements, based on the facts as a whole.

Question 4

If a loyalty programme allows users to transfer balances to other users, why should the SVF boundary be reassessed?

Accepted Answer

Because whether an arrangement constitutes an SVF depends on the monetary value stored and the payment commitment made by the issuer, not on whether the product calls itself “points”. If users can transfer balances to another user, a third-party merchant or another payee, the arrangement may have the characteristic of making payment to another person, and should be reviewed together with top-ups, redemption, the scope of permitted use and the actual contracts. Such a scenario does not automatically mean that a licence is required; the final determination still depends on the facts and applicable exemptions.

Question 5

Why should the issuance or promotion of issuance of a multi-purpose SVF be considered in light of the licensing regime?

Accepted Answer

The issuance or facilitation of the issuance of a multi-purpose SVF falls within the activities regulated under the licensing regime of the Monetary Authority of Hong Kong. Product design should not focus solely on the technology platform label while overlooking the actual role played. Who makes the stored value and payment commitments, who controls key arrangements, and who actually issues or facilitates the issuance should all be assessed in light of the facts and contracts.

Question 6

When partner institutions are involved in top-ups, payments or settlement, how can responsibility for issuing an SVF be identified?

Accepted Answer

Practical suggestion: first clarify each party’s actual responsibilities for account opening, top-ups, stored value, payments, merchant settlement, refunds and customer service, and confirm who makes the stored value and payment commitments to users. A party does not automatically obtain authorisation to issue or facilitate the issuance of an SVF merely because it is a registered company or a partner institution; responsibility must be assessed based on the specific arrangements.

Question 7

What is a single-purpose instrument, and why is it outside the definition of an SVF?

Accepted Answer

A genuine single-purpose instrument may be used only to purchase goods or services provided by its issuer and involves no commitment to make payments to another person; it therefore falls outside the definition of an SVF. The key considerations are the actual arrangements concerning the issuer, eligible purchases and payment recipients. If the scope of acceptance or payment commitments has expanded, the instrument should not continue to be self-classified as single-purpose.

Question 8

Why is a commitment to pay another person important when assessing whether an arrangement is single-purpose?

Accepted Answer

One boundary of a single-purpose instrument is that there is no undertaking to make a payment to another person. If users can store value and use it to pay someone other than the issuer, it would not be appropriate to exclude SVF solely by calling it a “house voucher” or “single-purpose” instrument. The payment recipient, accepted parties and specific undertakings made by the issuer to users should be examined.

Question 9

Are reward programmes or points with cash rebates automatically outside the SVF regime?

Accepted Answer

Not automatically. Schedule 8 provides exemption categories for certain reward or points schemes involving cash rebates or limited cash elements, but a product cannot be assumed to be exempt simply because it is described as a reward or points scheme. Its actual rights, the nature of the funds, scope of use and whether it meets the applicable conditions should be checked; where necessary, seek a professional assessment tailored to the structure.

Question 10

Could a stored value arrangement for purchasing specific digital products qualify for an exemption?

Accepted Answer

The Hong Kong Monetary Authority’s description of the regime states that an SVF for purchasing certain digital products may fall within a specified exemption category in Schedule 8. This is not a general authorisation for all digital content or online services. Whether the relevant conditions are met must be confirmed based on the digital products sold, the use of stored value, contractual terms and other actual functions.

Question 11

What scope restrictions are typically required for a limited-use SVF?

Accepted Answer

The limited use of an SVF referred to in official regime descriptions must be restricted to a specific group of goods or service providers, or to use at specified premises, and must also meet conditions including that its float does not exceed HK$1,000,000. Whether it falls within this category still depends on all actual restrictions continuing to be satisfied; it cannot be determined solely by the small number of merchants or by describing the arrangement as a closed ecosystem.

Question 12

If the float under a limited-use arrangement is below HK$1,000,000, is it automatically exempt?

Accepted Answer

No. HK$1,000,000 is one of the limited-use SVF conditions listed in the official guidance. The relevant scope restrictions, such as those concerning specified provider groups or specified premises, and the applicable statutory conditions must also be satisfied. An amount below that figure does not, by itself, prove that a product is automatically exempt; the product’s functions and operational facts should be assessed together.

Question 13

Can an exemption under Schedule 8 be obtained by self-declaration by a product?

Accepted Answer

It should not be understood that way. Schedule 8 provides for several exemption categories, but applicability should be assessed separately based on the facility’s actual commitments, flows of funds, accepted merchants, transfer and redemption arrangements. A product provider’s use of the terms “exempt”, “limited purpose” or similar does not change the actual functions and does not replace regulatory or professional judgment.

Question 14

Can the Monetary Authority make an exemption determination for an SVF on a case-by-case basis?

Accepted Answer

The Monetary Authority may decide whether to grant an exemption on a case-by-case basis, taking risk and materiality into account, and may also revoke that decision. This does not mean that market participants can assume they will necessarily receive an exemption. If the product design, scope of business, or risk profile changes, they should reassess whether the existing determination still applies and avoid treating a historical arrangement as a permanent conclusion.

Question 15

Does contracting through an overseas entity or hosting servers overseas mean that an SVF is not issued in Hong Kong?

Accepted Answer

Not necessarily. Whether a facility is “issued in Hong Kong” is determined by considering the facts as a whole. Official guidance takes into account actual operations, customer service, top-up channels, targeted promotion to Hong Kong residents, a Hong Kong domain name, acceptance of Hong Kong dollars, Hong Kong contact details, where the facility is used, and connections with Hong Kong banks or merchants. Overseas contracting or server location alone does not determine the outcome.

Question 16

Which authority regulates SVFs in Hong Kong, and what is the legal basis?

Accepted Answer

The Hong Kong Monetary Authority is responsible for licensing and supervising SVFs under the Payment Systems and Stored Value Facilities Ordinance (Cap. 584). The Monetary Authority may grant a licence only if satisfied that the applicant meets the applicable minimum criteria and will continue to meet them after licensing. This regime cannot be replaced by ordinary company registration or a partnership arrangement.

Question 17

Who can apply for an SVF licence?

Accepted Answer

Current official application guidance makes clear that only a company may apply to the Monetary Authority for an SVF licence, and the application must be made using the prescribed form. Incorporating a company alone does not mean it is authorised to issue or facilitate the issue of SVFs; the applicant must still demonstrate, in accordance with the applicable minimum criteria and supporting documents, that its arrangements can meet regulatory requirements.

Question 18

What are the requirements for Hong Kong address details on the SVF application form?

Accepted Answer

The application form must state the applicant’s principal place of business in Hong Kong, postal address and email address. Address details form part of the formal application information and should not be replaced by a partner’s address, a marketing contact method or a virtual display address alone. Before applying, confirm that the details entered are consistent with the actual operating and contact arrangements.

Question 19

Why must a qualifying SVF issuer have legal personality under Hong Kong law?

Accepted Answer

The Hong Kong Monetary Authority’s explanation of the implementation of the regime describes an eligible SVF issuer as a legal person under Hong Kong law, to facilitate effective supervision. This principle is unchanged even if some systems or operations are located outside Hong Kong. The specific corporate structure and operating arrangements should still be verified against the application materials and actual business; eligibility should not be inferred solely from overseas technology deployment.

Question 20

How should an SVF applicant company's principal business align with the proposed application?

Accepted Answer

The official licensing guidance states that the applicant company’s principal business should be issuing or facilitating the issuance of SVF under an SVF licence. Unrelated business should generally not be conducted unless it is necessary for SVF operations. If a change of business or new business is proposed, licence conditions may require prior consultation with the Monetary Authority. It should not be assumed that a licence can cover unrelated business without limit.

Question 21

Can an SVF licensee or applicant treat its licence as a general authorisation to conduct any new business?

Accepted Answer

No. An SVF licence relates to the regulated activity of issuing or facilitating the issuance of an SVF; it does not automatically authorise all other business activities. An application or licence arrangement may require the holder to consult the Monetary Authority before changing its principal business or undertaking new business. Whether another regulatory regime applies should be assessed separately based on the new business’s actual functions and fund arrangements.

Question 22

Is it worth communicating with the Hong Kong Monetary Authority before formally submitting an SVF application?

Accepted Answer

Practical suggestion: on the basis that preparations are being made to proceed in accordance with the minimum criteria, discussing the proposal with the Hong Kong Monetary Authority at an early stage can help avoid submitting an application prematurely and clarify the key areas for document preparation. This is an officially encouraged preparatory step; it does not constitute pre-approval or indicate that the authority has endorsed the product structure, completeness of the materials or eventual outcome.

Question 23

What is the difference between an SVF application being handled as “draft” and as “formal”?

Accepted Answer

If information is insufficient, the Hong Kong Monetary Authority may initially treat the application as “draft” and request that it be supplemented. Once the information is complete, it will notify the applicant in writing that the application is being treated as “formal”. This distinction reflects the stage of processing and does not mean that “formal” signifies approval, nor does it rule out further requests for information.

Question 24

After requesting that an application be processed as “formal”, will the Hong Kong Monetary Authority still ask for supplementary information?

Accepted Answer

Yes. Even if an application has been treated as “formal”, the Hong Kong Monetary Authority may still request further information on a case-by-case basis. Applicants should not interpret a notice of formal processing as final confirmation of the business model, independent assessment, safeguarding of funds, or other attachments; they should keep their information, contracts, and operational arrangements ready to address subsequent review.

Question 25

Is there a guaranteed fixed approval timeline for an SVF application?

Accepted Answer

No. Chapter 584 and current public application guidance do not publish or promise a uniform approval month or fixed number of days. Progress is affected by whether the application is complete, the number of rounds of supplementary information, interviews, business complexity, the quality of the independent assessment, and the applicant’s response time. Any fixed timeframe can only be a project estimate and must not be presented as a regulatory commitment.

Question 26

What procedural impact may result if documents requested for an SVF application are not submitted by the deadline?

Accepted Answer

If an applicant does not provide supplementary information within the specified period, the application may be suspended. If it has been suspended for six months or longer and the applicant still wishes to proceed, a new application will generally be required. This highlights the importance of managing supplementary requests, but the actual notice, deadline and handling must be determined by the requirements issued by the relevant authority for the case; no uniform timetable should be applied on the applicant’s own initiative.

Question 27

For a first-time SVF application, is it sufficient to prepare only a business plan and compliance manual?

Accepted Answer

No. Appendix B of the Hong Kong Monetary Authority lists a wider range of materials, including the complete application form, shareholding structure, company and management information, independent assessment, AML/CFT and float policies, user contracts, operating rules, contracts with parties to the proposed scheme, business plan, projections and company documents. The materials that actually apply should be checked against the entity and scheme; it is inadvisable to summarise them as two documents.

Question 28

If a newly established company has no complete historical financial records, can it simply assume that these are not required for an SVF application?

Accepted Answer

It should not be assumed. Appendix B includes materials such as audited annual reports and/or audited financial statements for the three financial years immediately preceding the application. A newly established company or a complex group without historical documents should confirm with the Hong Kong Monetary Authority at an early stage what alternative evidence may apply. The absence of historical information does not itself mean that an exemption has been granted.

Question 29

How many independent assessments must be submitted for an initial SVF application?

Accepted Answer

An initial application requires six separate assessments; they cannot be replaced by a single generic “compliance report”. The assessments should cover corporate governance and risk management, float management, the AML/CFT system, technology risk, payment security and business continuity separately, and should be prepared in accordance with the competent authority’s specific requirements for application materials.

Question 30

What areas do the six independent SVF assessments cover?

Accepted Answer

The six areas are corporate governance and risk management, float management, AML and CFT systems, technology risk, payment security, and business continuity. Each addresses a key operational risk. The fact that they share a supplier or internal policy text does not, by itself, mean that any of these areas need not be reviewed independently.

Question 31

What qualifications should an independent assessor for an SVF have?

Accepted Answer

An independent assessor should have qualifications, knowledge and experience commensurate with the matters being assessed, and must remain independent of the business unit being assessed. Compliance with the independence requirement cannot be inferred solely from the assessor being a business partner, a registered company or an existing service provider. The assessment arrangements should be checked against the specific scope, conflicts of interest and competence.

Question 32

How long is the independent assessment report for an SVF application valid?

Accepted Answer

Independent assessment reports are valid for no more than six months from the date of signing. Before submission, check the signing date against the application timetable to avoid relying on an expired report as supporting documentation. If the business, systems or control arrangements have also changed materially, do not rely on an old report without considering whether it remains relevant to the current arrangements.

Question 33

Why does an SVF application require AML/CFT risk management policies, procedures and a risk assessment report?

Accepted Answer

Annex B requires AML/CFT risk management policies and procedures, as well as a money laundering and terrorist financing risk assessment report. These are linked to the AML/CFT systems review in the six independent assessments. The documents should not simply reproduce a template; they should reflect the proposed SVF’s product features, customers, flow of funds and actual control arrangements.

Question 34

Why must an SVF application provide user agreements, planned operating rules and agreements with related parties?

Accepted Answer

Annex B requires contracts and terms with users, operating rules for each SVF scheme, and a contract setting out the rights and obligations of the parties to the scheme. These documents help show the actual arrangements for stored value, payments, refunds and the responsibilities of each party. They should not be mere marketing materials and should be consistent with the actual systems, funds flows and customer service procedures.

Question 35

What is the purpose of the three-year business plan and operating projections for an SVF application?

Accepted Answer

Annex B requires a three-year business plan and operating projections for the next three years to support the authority’s review of the proposed business and resource arrangements. The projections are not a guarantee of revenue, approval or market size. Their content should be consistently and reasonably explainable in relation to the product scope, float, number of accounts, costs, risk controls and actual operational assumptions.

Question 36

What is the minimum financial resources threshold for a non-bank SVF applicant?

Accepted Answer

A non-bank applicant must have paid-up share capital of at least HK$25,000,000 or other financial resources of an equal or greater amount. This is a minimum resource threshold and is not an allowance that includes customer float. The actual requirement may be increased depending on risk, the size of the float, the number of accounts and the complexity of the business.

Question 37

Is paid-up share capital the only way to meet the SVF requirement of HK$25,000,000?

Accepted Answer

No. The minimum criteria reflected in the official guidance provide two routes: paid-up share capital of at least HK$25,000,000, or other financial resources equal to or greater than the same amount. Prepare evidence appropriate to the applicant’s actual financial structure; do not misstate either route as the only permissible option.

Question 38

Can the paid-up share capital for an SVF be denominated in a currency other than HKD?

Accepted Answer

The Minimum Criteria permit the paid-up capital requirement to be met by an equivalent amount in another currency freely convertible into Hong Kong dollars, or in a currency approved by the Monetary Authority. The actual equivalent amount, the nature of the currency and the supporting evidence should be handled in accordance with official requirements. Compliance with the minimum financial resources threshold cannot be assumed solely because the amount is stated in a foreign currency in the accounts.

Question 39

Once HK$25,000,000 is reached, does an SVF applicant necessarily no longer need additional resources?

Accepted Answer

No. The Monetary Authority may impose higher financial resource requirements as licence conditions, based on risk, float size, number of accounts and business complexity. HK$25,000,000 is therefore a minimum baseline, not an upper limit for all proposals. Applicants should avoid promoting this figure as a sufficient condition for approval of any product.

Question 40

Can the financial resources in an SVF application be substituted for customer float, or vice versa?

Accepted Answer

No. Minimum financial resources and customer float are two distinct pools of funds; customer funds must not be treated as the applicant’s capital. Application preparation should separately record and explain capital or other financial resources, operating cash, float, refund amounts, and funds required for exit, to avoid using the same customer funds to demonstrate different obligations more than once.

Question 41

Why must SVF float and deposits be segregated from the licensee’s own funds?

Accepted Answer

The statutory minimum criteria require the float and SVF deposits to be segregated from other funds received, maintained or held by the applicant, and adequately safeguarded to support redemption of outstanding stored value. This is an arrangement for protecting user funds, not a general internal bookkeeping choice; mixing customer float with the applicant’s own operating funds would weaken this segregation requirement.

Question 42

For SVF float protection, is it sufficient to retain an amount equal to the refundable principal?

Accepted Answer

Not sufficient. The regulatory guidance requires both full refund funds and additional funds to cover the costs of payment distribution or refunds. Safeguarding arrangements should be able to address user redemptions and the costs of executing refunds themselves. Static matching based only on the total amount of float in the accounts, without considering refund execution costs, may not meet the purpose of this protection.

Question 43

Why Are SVF Float Funds Usually Held Under a Trust Arrangement?

Accepted Answer

The Hong Kong Monetary Authority’s guidance identifies an effective trust arrangement as the usual route, giving users legal rights and priority claims if the licensee becomes insolvent. A trust is not established merely because “trust” appears in an account name; the specific legal documents, segregation of funds, trustee arrangements and actual operation must all support the intended protection.

Question 44

Can a bank guarantee or insurance be used to safeguard SVF float?

Accepted Answer

Where there are sufficient grounds, a valid bank guarantee and/or insurance may be used as an alternative or supplementary arrangement for safeguarding the float. This does not mean that every arrangement must choose one of a trust, guarantee and insurance, nor should acceptance be assumed. The arrangement must be reviewed on a case-by-case basis in light of product risk, legal effectiveness and adequacy of protection.

Question 45

How should users’ top-up funds in transit be treated in SVF float management?

Accepted Answer

The regulatory guidance expressly treats top-up funds in transit as float. Accordingly, safeguarding and accounting design should not cover only balances that have been credited, but should also identify the status and protection arrangements for funds in the process of being topped up. The specific process should clearly track when funds enter the scope of protection, avoiding discrepancies between records and actual funds.

Question 46

What requirements do SVF user ledgers have for managing float?

Accepted Answer

The user ledger must be accurate, up to date and reflect the total amount of float and deposits at all times. The ledger is not merely an operational report; it is an important basis for reconciling customer liabilities and safeguarded assets. System design, reconciliation frequency and exception handling should support this continuous reflection requirement, rather than only providing a month-end summary.

Question 47

What should be done if the safeguarded account funds are less than the ledger float?

Accepted Answer

If a shortfall arises because funds in safeguarding accounts fall below the ledger float, regulatory guidance requires prompt reporting to senior management and the Hong Kong Monetary Authority. This requirement emphasises early identification and escalation; the shortfall should not be treated as an ordinary operational error and left unaddressed, nor can anticipated future top-ups offset an existing shortfall.

Question 48

Can SVF float be invested in assets other than cash or bank deposits?

Accepted Answer

The primary purpose of float management is liquidity, not generating significant investment income. If low-risk financial assets other than cash or bank deposits are to be held, adequate risk controls must first be demonstrated and written consent obtained from the Hong Kong Monetary Authority. Without that prior written consent, a general low-risk investment cannot be regarded as automatically permitted.

Question 49

Can SVF float management freely accept mismatches between different currencies?

Accepted Answer

Currency mismatches are generally not permitted unless effective exchange-rate risk controls are in place; regulatory practice guidance gives mismatches between the Hong Kong dollar and US dollar as an exception. This exception should not be expanded into a safe harbour permitting unrestricted mismatches between all currencies. Where a product involves multi-currency stored value or settlement, the corresponding risk controls and safeguards should be explained separately.

Question 50

How should a licensee handle a user’s request to redeem the remaining stored value?

Accepted Answer

At the user’s request, the licensee should redeem the stored value in full as soon as practicable and provide easily accessible redemption channels. If a redemption fee is charged, it must be clearly and prominently disclosed in the user contract. The general redemption requirement may be disapplied only where the Monetary Authority permits this in exceptional circumstances, and the expiry date and conditions for non-redeemability must be disclosed.

Licensing hotline	+852 3050 1899
Shenzhen mobile number / same number for WeChat	+86 159 2000 2080
Hong Kong / WhatsApp	+852 9298 4213
Email	Drew@sfc8.com
Official website	svf-hk.com
Hong Kong Address	86/F, International Commerce Centre (ICC), 1 Austin Road West, Kowloon, Hong Kong

SVF Stored Value Facility

Contact RGYS

WhatsApp Enquiry

WeChat Contact

Leave Your Enquiry